You Cant Reason With Logic by G.X. Jupitter-Larsen Then his head just exploded. Just like that. Without any warning. One moment he was talking to a few friends, the next, spontaneous combustion. The gentleman in question had but one burning passion in life. A desire for counting sand, one grain at a time. He would bring home a bag of the stuff from the beach. Dump it out on his desk and count each little fragment particle. It would usually take all day. The largest number he ever counted was 19,003. The least, 4,898. An associate of his who kept up an on-going chart said the average number was 15,064. Typically thoughts are every bit as tangible as any physical thing. Mainly, there are two reasons for this. The first reason being, that those things which are ethereal are really just a specific kind of wave function. Things which are physical are just a different kind of wave function; but still a wave function. Different only in velocity. Because that of the abstract, and that of the physical are both equally real, it is the structure of understanding which is the agenda of debate. The act of how something is explained is the manner in which one gets accuracy through aesthetics. Debate is that specific event in which, the how in which something is explained, will be performed. Both that which is said and that which is not said being equal parts of the same algorithm. The efficiency or practicality of the explanation is completely dependent on the personal aesthetics involved in any given debate. The gentleman who's head exploded had three close friends. The one thing they all had in common was an aesthetic compulsion for dividing flimsy calamities. With the cause being the abstract and physical being equally tangible, the effect was an acceleration of entropy. Things just fell apart after that. Silent devises for measuring balanced and duplicated kindling. But a waxy division dwarfed all dizzies. They would always misbehave whole-heartedly. They flabbergasted the bash and effigyed the dynamic. So there. Oshaberi-o taihen tanoshimi mashita. Ystumio can; yle'dely can only be efiently discussed thr'ouh the acities and the su'hereans. Entropy is toe' ine'tics of ow' altities interact. They do see other ways, naturÕ that rat! Myledely can only be efficiently discussed through the aciÕties and the su'hereof; with all of ta-ct'touch. TranÕsi transit, transit. Moving sim'uy any mer' of-ea'ns. Entropy is the byproduct oe' ine'tics of ow' al-tities interact. They do see other ways, nature is that ra'tionship! My untiteÕdely can only be efficiently discussed through the acities and the su-here'o'; with all of the said portions being equal. And nohingness. Fam ever coming ino' ontact'. Transit, transit, transit. Moving sim'uy any mer' of'eans. Entropy is the byproduct of the ine'tics of ow' altities interact. They do see other words, nature is that ra'tionship. It was when things finally settled down a bit that his head blew up. And when the gentleman's head exploded, his friends got side-tracked; and they all remembered that it was an organismÕs metabolism that was relative, not time. |